Updated Aug 22, 2013
Notes about some Questions (Page 7)
INTRODUCTION
-
If a note below is about a Part 2 topic, the note assumes that the wording of the Part 2 topics, especially the verb tense, is as shown in the list of topics on this website. Possibly the real wording is different to that shown on this website. BE CAREFUL!
If some of the notes on this page are possible in an answer to a question, be very careful about speaking those exact same words, especially word combinations, in the test. If several people speak the same sentences in the test, the examiners will eventually know that these sentences are not your original words. This will seriously damage your score! Some examiners might even read this website. Examiners don't like answers that candidates learn, word for word, from a book, a website or from the blackboard in a class because such answers are not real, natural communication. The best idea is to adapt the ideas below (if you want to) by making your own sentences and speaking naturally in the test. (Completely memorized answers are usually not spoken in a very natural way.) Try to avoid letting the examiner know that you have read this website!!
-
For many Part 2 topics, you can get some additional ideas by reading the Part 3 questions that follow that topic.
*************************************************************************
Topic 377, A Job You Wanted to Do
Notes for Part 2
*************************************************************************
Don't forget, there are two main types of written letters - handwritten letters and letters that are written on a computer and then printed. That is, not all letters are "handwritten".
In a way, emails are a form of "letter" but we generally use the two different terms, "letter" and "email", to differentiate them. But it would be "too much of a stretch" to include text messages on cell phones as a form of letter, even though some people text a message using the same words they would if they were writing a letter.
*************************************************************************
-
Many people have been writing on the internet since the start of May that there is a topic, "Describe a difficult thing that you did well." I don't know if they are all copying the wording of what someone wrote on a blog in China or if their card really did say that. I have added that topic as Topic 416. Although it seems to be a new topic, Topic 416 and Topic 379 might really be the one, same topic.
-
This Topic 379 seems similar to Topic
-
The point, "
-
For the last line, if the wording is "
-
The wording above does not ask you to say when you achieved this goal. But even if it does not ask you to say that, you must give some indication of when it happened whenever you use past tense verbs.
|
Notes
|
*************************************************************************
Describe something you hope to do. *
For example, new technology might make it possible for computer programs to be easily written by average people, thereby making the job of computer programmer redundant. Of course, other changes might also affect your future plans. For example, economic and political changes in the world, such as war or whether or not you are able to emigrate to another country, which is your plan.
*************************************************************************
Part 2 Topic 381, A Foreign Culture
The word, "culture" has rather broad interpretations. (Look up the word in a good dictionary.) When we speak of the single word, "culture", we are talking either about "high culture" or "popular culture". High culture is the practice and appreciation of certain artistic and intellectual pursuits that usually only the wealthiest and/or most educated people (i.e., the upper class) participate in. An example of this in the West is opera. If you go to London or New York, you'll probably find that there is a major operatic performance in some concert hall every month or so in those cities, but you won't find many factory workers or bus drivers in the audience. On the other hand, if you go to Italy, which is the home of Western opera, you will find many factory workers and bus drivers who love to sing in this style and some of them might even attend major opera performances. You could say opera, or at least this style of singing, is a part of both the indigenous culture of Italy and "popular culture" in Italy, but it is not representative of English or American popular culture nor is it indigenous to those countries.
In China, calligraphy (书法) is a form of art that is part of indigenous Chinese culture. Originally it was only practiced by the elite minority who could read and write but today quite a few average people practice it as an art form and the average Chinese person appreciates it. Therefore, it can now be considered to be part of the "popular culture". In this modern age, you could say that most examples of what used to be "high culture" that are indigenous to a country are now, more or less, part of the "popular culture" in that country, even if only some of the average people practice or appreciate it. Just like this example of calligraphy in China and opera in Italy, Mozart and Beethoven's and certainly Strauss's music (and that general style of music) is probably close to "popular culture" in Germany and Austria (where Mozart, Beethoven and Strauss came from) because many of the average people (although probably mostly middle-aged and older) in those countries would attend a concert featuring this style of music. But in countries that are quite distinct from Germany and Austria such as Britain, the U.S.A., Japan, China, Australia etc, only the more "highbrow" people would attend such a concert.
This Part 2 asks you to talk about the culture of a certain country. The meaning of "the culture of a certain country" is, "the customs (traditions), lifestyle, values and popular culture of that society". Here, "popular culture" refers to artistic, entertainment and recreational pursuits, including sport and the arts such as literature, music, dance, and other forms of performing that are enjoyed by average people and/or are traditional in that country. You should try, as much as possible, to talk about things that are unique to a certain country but it is usually not easy to find aspects of a culture that are 100% unique to one country. For example, in Italy the people like to use a lot of olive oil in their food but so do all of the people in the countries that border the Mediterranean Sea. And Italian people love soccer but this is certainly not unique to Italy!
When most people think of "Australian culture", they think of an outdoor lifestyle such as enjoying barbeques in summer, a love of sport and going to the beach in summer because most Australians live close to the coast and Australia has many good beaches. Australians also typically have an egalitarian outlook towards other people, a strong sense of being fair in human relations and a rather "easy-going" attitude in general. [Although the arts, both the "high arts" and popular forms of entertainment are quite highly developed in Australia, I would not emphasize this as a major part of "Australian culture" because the arts in Australia are not very distinct from those in continental Europe, Britain and the U.S.A.. On the other hand, there is an Australian style of folk singing, sung in the Irish style, that celebrates the early pioneers in "the bush" in Australia.] In general, modern Australian culture now includes many elements from continental Europe and places such as Turkey, especially concerning food, as a result of large-scale immigration in the past 65 years. And, of course, American films, television and popular music are now a part of modern Australian culture. It would be suitable to include modern aspects of the culture of a country in your talk but you should try, if you can, to emphasize any older, typical or unique aspects of the culture, i.e., the traditional culture.
You don't have to be an expert on the culture of a foreign country to answer this Part 2 and it would not matter too much if some of your knowledge of a foreign culture is inaccurate! Just speak for less than 2 minutes about what you know about the culture of another country and, most importantly, why it is interesting to you.
In summary, talk about another country that interests you but only talk about the society, not about the physical aspects of the country such as mountains or beaches or the animals such as kangaroos.
Be careful about how you express the point about everybody influencing each other's culture - this is a good point but it could indicate to the examiner that you had read this website.
*************************************************************************
-
So far, two different versions of this have been reported, a past tense version (a foreign product you bought) and a "would like to buy" version (a foreign product you would like to buy). It seems that more people are reporting Version B as the topic being used, i.e., "would like to buy" looks like the more likely topic.
-
"*" means I am guessing at the wording.
-
On the other hand, if the topic just says, "a foreign product" then it is possible to either, a) talk about a product you would like to buy (or, bought) while on an overseas trip or, b) talk about an imported product you would like to buy (or, bought).
Be prepared for possible Part 3 questions on the topic of buying products while on an overseas trip. Usually these products are souvenirs but some people go overseas especially on "buying trips".
*************************************************************************
Part 3 Topic 392
Nobody has mentioned yet that the previous question, "
Then, if the question above was first asked, the following question, "
However, people have this generalized "feeling" because they are not aware of the political ideology, and the growing power of the political movement that is behind the "corporate responsibility" concept. There are some people in the West who have a political ideology based on the idea that all social activities are best performed according to "market forces". Basically, this is a strongly anti-socialist ideology, which seeks to privatize virtually all public assets and services, thereby greatly reducing the responsibilities and the political power of governments. The same people who promote this ideology also claim that corporations should be given "personhood", which means both the rights and responsibilities of a person. And it is no co-incidence that these same people are the ones who promote the notion of "corporate social responsibility", the responsibility to "give back to society" by performing some kind of public service.
On the other hand, people who oppose this ideology believe that this is dangerous and would eventually lead to the situation where governments will have no political power because they will provide very few public services and will simply be administrators performing duties for corporations. Furthermore, if public assets are privatized, the pubic, i.e., the masses of ordinary people who do not own shares in these corporations, will have no public ownership of important public assets such as the water supply system, national parks and other public lands, or cheap, subsidized public transportation systems. This would reduce the general public to a situation resembling serfdom. Those who oppose the "corporate responsibility" idea say that corporations should simply pay their fair share of taxes and allow governments to decide how the money is spent on public services. The opponents of the "corporate responsibility" idea say it is simply a backdoor way of easing governments out of the job of providing free or cheap public services and that, sooner or later, these voluntary and initially free minor examples of corporate public service will grow in scope and will become a business which people will have to pay for.
An answer to this question that is less political in nature could include the idea that corporations really only do things in the interests of their shareholders – that is the very nature of a corporation. In the case of corporations providing public services, this is simply a public relations exercise, done with the aim of popularizing the name of the company in the minds of the public.
If you get this question, be very careful not to reveal that you had obviously read this website. Examiners won't like that.
*************************************************************************
Topic 398 An Interesting Shop
Although I cannot be 100% sure, I think Topic 347, A Shop is different to Topic 398, An Interesting Shop in a key way, the usage of the word, "interesting". Topic 347 seems to be more about liking a certain shop but Topic 398 seems to be more about finding a certain shop interesting.
What's the difference?
Basically, when you talk about why you like something, you express feelings but when you talk about why something is interesting to you, you express rational thoughts. In the West, we say people talk about what's "in the heart" to express feelings but we use the brain to have rational thoughts. For example, you can say you like something because it is convenient but you cannot say something is "interesting" simply because it is convenient.
When we find something interesting, there are several different types of rational thoughts that are possible. Probably the most common rational thought is comparison – we compare something with other things of the same class (e.g., compare a shop with other shops) to see how different it is. If it is not different at all, we usually feel it's not especially interesting; if it's so different that it's unique (or unusual), we usually say it's very interesting.
Other possible rational thoughts are connected to learning and curiosity. If something arouses your curiosity and causes you to ask questions, it means we find it interesting. And if we learn something new from this thing, we usually say it's interesting.
There is some overlap between "liking" and "finding something interesting". It is possible to say you like something simply because it is interesting. Human beings like having their brains stimulated in this way. On the other hand, we can't usually say we find something interesting simply because we like it. (But there is a possible exception to this, based on rational thought. For example, you might say you don't like the sport of boxing because you think it is brutal and not really athletic. But then, one day, you watched a boxing box on TV and liked it for some special reason. You could then say, "That's interesting, I don't normally like boxing matches but I liked this one." Here, you are comparing what you normally feel about boxing matches with what you felt this time and you found they were different, and that fact itself interests you. It causes you to wonder, "That's interesting. Why did I like it this time?")
Of course, since this is a past tense topic, you must say when you went to this shop (if you only went there once), even if the card does not specifically tell you to say that. If you go there habitually, you could say that, instead.
I might be wrong but I believe two slightly different sets of Part 3 questions exist in the examiner's question book for Topics 347 and 398 but there is a large degree of overlap between the two. This seems to be skillfully done and, given the limited amount of information I have, it is difficult to clearly separate the two. For example, I think it is possible that Topic 347 had a question about credit cards and a question about internet shopping but Topic 398 might have expanded these single questions into whole sub-topics, with several questions for these sub-topics. Furthermore, the examiners themselves are probably sometimes using questions that they remember from Topic 347 when they do the Part 3 of Topic 398. (Examiners are allowed to make their own questions in Part 3, as well as using the suggested questions in the question book.) Therefore, the safest thing to do is to look at all the Part 3 questions for both 347 and 398. This results in quite a long list of different sub-topics and questions but, as I mentioned, given the limited information available, it seems too difficult to say what is not in Part 3 for Topic 398. Certainly, during February, March and April 2012 we have seen several new sub-topics and questions but they are being used alongside similar or identical questions from Part 3 of Topic 347 as used before January 2012.
The Part 3 questions from Topic 347 have been copied to Part 3 for Topic 398. New questions from after February 2012 have, of course, only been added to Topic 398.
*************************************************************************
Topic 407 - A Place with Water
You should be careful about how you talk about "swimming" as a water sport in these natural places. People mostly swim when they are in water (water that is too deep for wading) simply because it is the only way to move from A to B in water! As a sport, swimming is mostly done in swimming pools, although there are competitive swimming events, such as the Triathlon (and here), that include swimming in a lake, river or bay etc. And even people who swim up and down the length of a swimming pool are not really engaging in a "sport" - they are simply doing a form of exercise.
Most of the water sports that people engage in at these natural places are recreational sports, not competitive sports. See this note I wrote for Topic 140.
See also the Wikipedia List of Water Sports and the Wikipedia article, Surface Water Sports.
---------------------------------
Part 3
The word is "fishermen", not "fishers"
*************************************************************************
-
A student asked me if it would be suitable to talk about China's National Day (October 1) as an example of an important event in history. See mentioned "celebrating" that day as her example. No, that would not be suitable. The wording of the question asks you to describe one event that happened, at one time in the past (in history) that is important in the history of your country. You need to use the past tense to answer this. National Day happens every year and you would need to use the present tense (the present "habit" tense) to talk about that. So, although National Day commemorates an important event in history, using National Day as your example of an important event in history is not suitable. However, (and perhaps this was the real meaning of her question), it would (of course) be suitable to talk about the birth of "new China" on October 1, 1949 as your example and mention as extra information that it is commemorated every year.
-
Another student asked if it would be suitable to talk about the Tang Dynasty as an example of an important event in history. No, it would not be suitable. The Tang Dynasty was an important period in China's history but it is not suitable to call a period of history "an event". Yes, some events in history occurred over a period of time, not just in one day, and these would be suitable as an answer. For example, China's war of resistance against Japanese aggression that occurred between the the 1930's and 1945 would be a suitable example, as would the Chinese civil war that occurred between the 1920's (?) and 1949. Both of those could be called "an event".
-
It would be possible to talk about a recent event and explain that it is important in history, although it is possible that this importance will be seen more clearly in the future. Such an example would be China's hosting of the Olympic Games in 2008. That's only 4 years ago, i.e., recent history, but it is still "history" and it was an important event for China.
These are the words of the question as it was reported. But I
think it is more likely to be this:
If the examiner does not use the words "foreign tourists", then the comparison is between all tourists, including those from within the country, compared to people who live in the same city or same locality as the museum.
*************************************************************************
Part 2 Topic 416 - A Difficult Thing
------------
Part 3, Topic 416
This is an obvious question for this topic, although I haven't yet seen such a question reported. It might be words like, "Are there any particular groups (or types) of people who face particular difficulties in their daily lives?"
"Types of people" = classifications of people or groups of people. For this question, it's your choice of what types of people to talk about.
Here are some examples: old people, young people, married people, unmarried people, childless couples, people with big families, shy people, lonely people. poor people, people living on a low income, rich people!, unemployed people, people who have a poor education, illiterate people, mentally and physically disabled people, ugly people, (exceptionally good-looking people!), exceptionally tall, short, fat or thin people, people from minority ethnic groups, people with different jobs such as .... farmers, taxi drivers, bus drivers, long-distance truck drivers, school teachers, police officers, firemen, miners, soldiers, traveling salespeople, mariners (people working on ships that travel to distant places), airline pilots, small shop owners, ....
*************************************************************************
-
"*" = my guess.
-
I doubt that this says "Describe a birthday party". Instead, I think the word "celebration" is more likely to be used. Of course, a celebration is most often a party but it could also be a picnic, an outing to a karaoke bar with your friends, a get-together with some friends in a bar, a meal together with your friends in a restaurant or some other type of activity such as simply sharing a birthday cake in the office with your workmates and singing "Happy Birthday" but nothing else. ["Friends" could also be "friends and family members".] These resemble "a party" but native English-speakers would not always call them "a party". A "party" usually includes a variety of nice things to eat, which are most often laid out so that people can freely choose what and when to eat, drinks, free chatting and movement among the party guests, and very often (depending on the culture of the people), music, dancing and possibly singing. There might also be special party games. For a birthday party, Westerners have a birthday cake with candles,
*************************************************************************
What is "a vehicle"?
-
My Oxford dictionary says that it is "a conveyance such as a car, lorry, or cart used for transporting goods or passengers on land".
-
The online Macmillan Dictionary says it is, "a machine that you travel in or on, especially one with an engine that travels on roads, for example a car, bus, van, truck, or motorcycle". By "machine" they mean it is "mechanical", i.e., it is a man-made thing that has moving parts. Even a cart pulled by a horse is mechanical because the wheels move. However, I think the Macmillan Dictionary is wrong to say that it must have an engine – everyone agrees that a bicycle is an example of a vehicle but a bicycle has no engine of its own – the "engine" (or the source of mechanical power) is the rider him or herself. Both the Oxford and Macmillan Dictionaries agree that a vehicle travels on land but I don't think it is necessary to restrict it to roads, as the Macmillan Dictionary does.
-
However, Wikipedia, which represents American English more than British English, has a much broader definition of "vehicle", which includes air and water transport. They say a vehicle is, "a mobile machine that is designed or used to transport passengers or cargo. Most often vehicles are manufactured, such as bicycles, cars, motorcycles, trains, ships, boats and aircraft." In the IELTS test, it would be safer to restrict your choice to a land vehicle that has wheels because this is probably what most examiners understand a "vehicle" to be.
-
In Chinese, "vehicle" more or less means 車. (I prefer the 繁体字 for this!)
-
It's not wrong to say you would like to buy a certain brand of car as your answer. But you need to make sure that you communicate clearly to the examiner when you say the brand name of the car. If it's a car that has an English name, make sure you know the correct English name and the correct pronunciation. Even if you think you are speaking an English language name because the Chinese name is based on the English name, the English pronunciation might be a little different! Tell the examiner that what you are saying is the brand name of the car. If the brand name is only used in your country, such as 吉利 (Geeli or Jili) you need to especially careful because the examiner might not know this name.
The pronunciation of "vehicle"
Although you, as the candidate, might not need to say the word "vehicle", the examiner will say it at least once. Most English speakers don't pronounce the "h" but a few do. Here are two examples of how the word is pronounced: http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/vehicle, http://www.howjsay.com/index.php?word=vehicle&submit=Submit.
For Extra Vocabulary and Extra Ideas
-
See "Related Dictionary Definitions" on the page, http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/vehicle.
-
Motor homes (= mobile homes): http://dornob.com/worlds-most-luxurious-and-expensive-mobile-home/, http://www.volkner-mobil.com/Reisemo/R_english/Perf_en.html & http://www.idesignarch.com/the-ultimate-luxury-mobile-home-elemment-palazzo/
-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recreational_vehicle. On that page, "recreational vehicle" also includes motor homes, campers and caravans. A "caravan" is British English for the American term, "travel trailer". See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travel_trailer.
How to Speak for this Part 2 Topic
There are two choices:
a) "I'd like to buy a bicycle." = "I want to buy a bicycle."
The word, "want" means that you really do want something; it's a goal, a plan or a strong desire. For example, "I'd like to buy a bicycle because I want to save time traveling between my dormitory and my university classroom."
b) "I'd like to buy a Lamborghini sports car" = "I would be happy if I had a Lamborghini sports car"
This is talking about a fantasy, not a real goal or plan. (Lamborghini sports cars are very expensive.)
You should not use the word, "want" when speaking like this.
*************************************************************************
Part 2 Topic 420 - A Piece of Electronic Equipment
-
Make sure you know the difference between "electrical" and "electronic".
-
The first line might say "a piece of electronic equipment" instead of "an electronic device". A "device" is rather small, such as something you can hold in your hand but "equipment" tends to be bigger than a device, even very big. The word "equipment" also often means "several items that are used for a practical task", or a collection of items.
-
It is also possible that this topic is more specific, more restricted. That is, it might say, "Describe an electronic communications device that you have (or want to have in the future.)"
-
I think the first line has some words that allow you to talk about something that you don't actually have now such as, "... or want to have in the future", "... or plan to have in the future" etc.
-
"*" = my guess at the wording.
-
English speakers do not use "PPT" to refer to Powerpoint.
-
*************************************************************************
(Especially for Chinese candidates)
If you answer, "They're both important" (都重要) it will slightly damage your score in the test. The question assumes that both are important; this is already understood. The examiner is asking you which one you think is more important than the other. If you want to say that they have equal importance, then you must use the word "equal" or a similar word to express this idea. For example: "They're (both) equally important", "They (both) have equal importance", "The father is just as important as the mother", "They have the same (amount of/degree of) importance" etc.
*************************************************************************
Part 2 Topic 424 - A Famous Person
-
"Influence" and "change" go together - you cannot have one without the other.
-
If the words, "impressed you" are used instead of "influenced you", then you should talk more about your feelings of respect for this person than about any change that happened to you as a result of knowing about this famous person.
-
The point, "
-
I think you should talk about a person who is both famous in your country and who is from your country. This is because it is possible that the words, "from your country" are used. The words, "famous in your country" can mean "famous in the whole world, including your country" and this person could possibly be from another country.
-----------------------
-
"Too much" means, "an excessive amount".
-
This question might use the word "celebrities" instead of "famous people", or "popular entertainment stars".
-
A "celebrity" is a particular type of famous person, usually in show business or the world of culture. Celebrities might appear on TV talk show programs or in magazine articles and talk about themselves and reveal their personalities - people are interested in, and know something about the private lives of "celebrities". Famous people of a more serious nature, such as in politics or science, are not usually called "celebrities". For example, Albert Einstein was famous when he was alive but it was probably not suitable to call him a "celebrity". And some people are or were famous for their bad deeds, such as mass murderers - these people are labeled as "infamous" and they are certainly not "celebrities".
-
Learn the term, "the tabloid media" or "
If the wording for this question uses the word, "famous", then of course it is suitable to say that some government leaders are famous, such as the President or Prime Minister of your country. But if the word, "celebrity" is used, then it is not common for politicians to become "celebrities", although sometimes they do, especially after they leave office. (See the explanation of "celebrity" in the notes above.)
*************************************************************************
Here, the meaning of "environment" is similar to, "surroundings", not just the physical or natural environment aspects such as the quality of the air.
*************************************************************************
The notes written below apply if the the wording is
So, I suggest you prepare to talk about both an ancestor (if you can) and simply someone from the past so you will be prepared for either wording. If the wording just says, "someone from the past", be very careful about using the example of an ancestor because that might cause the examiner to think you had been to a website such as this one. But, logically, talking about an ancestor is possible but not necessary in this case.
I doubt that the wording is, "a (famous) historical figure" instead of, "a person from the past". It could be someone who is not "famous" but simply someone from the past who you know about, such as an earlier inhabitant of your hometown. However, talking about a famous person from history, would, of course, be suitable.
Yes, it seems that family history is one of the sub-topics in Part 3. But that does not necessarily mean it is the topic of Part 2.
If the Part 2 Topic Asks You to Talk about an Ancestor
-
The word, "ancestor" probably is not used in this Part 2, but that is the meaning.
-
It can include one of your grandparents. However, if this grandparent is still alive, it would not be very suitable to say he or she is "from the past". If you want to talk about a grandparent who is still alive, say the person has died, even if he or she hasn't died, in order to make this grandparent fit the words, "from the past".
-
Learn the meaning of words such as "great-grandfather", "great-great-grandfather", "three generations ago" etc.
-
The card might say "they", meaning "him or her".
-
Here, the meaning is that you consider that the life of this ancestor was interesting. Your ancestor himself or herself might have thought they were living a very average life, a hard life or even a boring life! Possibly the last line is written as, "What is interesting about the life he or she lived." This is referring to the fact that the story of this person's life is interesting to you, now.
*************************************************************************
-
A "character" is different to the identity of the real actor or actress who plays this character. That is, a "character" is a role that an actor or actress plays in a film, play or TV program. An actor might play many characters over the course of his career. Therefore, the personality, the interests, the values, the actions etc. of the character might be very different to the real
-
The name of the character is not the same as the real name of the actor! For example, you could talk about Batman without even knowing the name of the actor.
-
It might even be possible to talk about a cartoon character such as Donald Duck! Or Tom, the cat in the Tom and Jerry cartoons.
*************************************************************************
Part 3 Topic 431
-
Of course, if it is this wording, it means "young people in general", which also means "most young people".
-
The words, "exciting things" might be changed to, "exciting activities", "extreme activities", "adventurous activities" etc.
*************************************************************************
The question might be: "
Or, it might be, "What forms of physical exercise are popular where you live?"
*************************************************************************
Some General Notes on this Part 3
-
In your answers for several of these questions, it is most suitable to first make a general statement or two and then follow that with some specific examples. You often might need to use the expression, "It would depend on ..." or, "It depends on ..."
-
Some of these questions really are asking you to state and discuss the factors that people consider before they make decisions about their time usage.
-
One of the topics that the examiners are thinking of here is your planned private study time - how you plan it, etc. So don't forget to include that in one of your answers.
-
In these notes, I can't be too specific and I can't give you example answers because if I do, there is a big chance that the examiners will be given this information and will be told to reduce your score if they recognize that you have obviously read this website. Caution! 小心!
-----------------
-
A "schedule" is a time plan for a certain period of time. For example, if you are going to visit Shanghai for 1 week, you might have a plan for what you are going to do each day of your one-week stay. You can also make a schedule just for one day or even half a day.
-
A "timetable" is similar to a schedule but timetables repeat themselves such as every week, every day or every month. Students have a class timetable, which might say that they have a maths class at 9 am every Monday and Wednesday. Trains and buses run according to timetables.
-
A "routine" is a habit of doing the same thing at the same time on different days. It is similar to "timetable" but a timetable is a written plan while a routine might just be a habit. For example, part of John's routine is to buy a sandwich every morning on the way to work. And the regular (= habitual, usual) time that John leaves home to go to the subway station or the bus stop is part of his routine. People usually have set routines for Monday to Friday, when they go to work or classes but they might not have set routines on the weekend.
-
The British and American pronunciations of "schedule" are different but quite a few British and Australian people choose to use the American pronunciation nowadays. The difference is in how the first part of the word, i.e., the "sch" is pronounced. Here you will hear both pronunciations, with the American spoken first.
